A glimmer of hope still on the horizon

Monday 12 October 2009 |

The fate of Europe still hangs in the balance, with just one man, Vaclav Klaus, the Czech President, holding out for the people of Europe. The Times today has reported that his application for an amendment to the Lisbon Treaty is now being supported by his own Government, which looks like a major U-turn from them, having previously been encouraged to consider impeaching the President:

After an emergency Cabinet meting this morning, Jan Fischer, the Czech Prime Minister, said that he would put President Klaus's call for a human rights opt-out to the next European summit on October 29
Many, of course, believe that this is very much a delaying tactic, in the hope that the Tories win the next General Election in the UK and hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty immediately, as David Cameron has promised.

It is a sad day when the people of Europe are denied a say on their own future by an anti-democratic conspiracy of European leaders seeking to create a new European superstate. Thank goodness we have Vaclav Klaus, who is willing to risk his political career both at home and internationally to stand up for the right of the public to decide our own future.



Libertas accounts published

Saturday 10 October 2009 |

For anyone interested, the EU election returns have been published by the Electoral Commission. Our 'return' is here and the invoice sheet is here.


In total, including a large amount of notional expenditure, Libertas spent £98,050 on the June EU elections. That compares reasonably to the No2EU campaign that spent £89K and achieved a similar percentage of the vote.

Campaign posters

Thursday 1 October 2009 |

Here are a couple of current campaign posters from Ireland:








Democracy for sale in Ireland?

Wednesday 30 September 2009 |

Since Brian Cowen has run away from the Lisbon debate and left it to Michael O'Leary of RyanAir to be the principle spokesman for the Yes campaign, it is no surprise that it has become a dirty fight. Oddly, Cowen is using a man who describes his government as 'incompetent' and 'feckless' to fight on his behalf.


Having previously called it 'undemocratic' to force the Irish to vote again, why is Mr O'Leary involved at all? A big clue might have been given when he admitted on television:
“One of the reasons that I am campaigning for a ‘yes’ vote is that our Government is incompetent, yet I need to persuade them to sell me Aer Lingus.”
So the main proponent of the Yes campaign is doing so, by his own admission, to indebt the Irish Government into reversing their block of his takeover bid.

Come on Ireland, kick this grubby Yes campaign to the curb.


No referendum for Britain

|

Having played the referendum card for the European elections in June, the Tory leader, David Cameron, admitted today that there is no chance of Britain having a referendum. Of course, they hid it behind weasel words, but the reality is obvious.


If Ireland votes No, the Treaty is dead. If Ireland votes Yes, then all that remains is for Poland, Germany and the Czech republic to endorse it before May next year (the likely date of a UK General Election). There is little hope that any of those three countries could hold out long enough for a Tory Government to come into power and hold a referendum.

So the reality is that the Tories will form the next Government in May 2010, in an EU that will probably have had the Lisbon Treaty ratified by all member states and in place for several months. There will be nothing that the Tories can do, especially since their entire intent is to "not let matters rest". I bet the EU leaders are shaking in their boots.

But are the Tories willing to admit that there is nothing that they can do? Of course not; that would be far too honest.


Pro-Lisbon campaign yobs

Monday 28 September 2009 |

The Irish Times over the weekend reported on a Libertas press conference that was invaded by a bunch of pro-Lisbon yobs from 'Ireland for Europe' (what kind of illiterate name is that anyway?).


Not willing to allow Libertas to launch its new posters and debate in a civilised manner afterwards, the anti-democrats swamped Declan Ganley trying to cause as much disruption as possible while also shouting over him. They also shoved their own posters over the new Libertas poster, as you can see from the picture.

So not only are the Yes campaign using big business to outspend the No campaign by ten to one (yes, they are spending 10 times as much!), they are seeking to physically disrupt the No campaign as well. All the while, Brian Cowen refuses to debate the treaty in public.

Such is the face of 'democracy' in the EU. Does anyone need another reason to vote No?



Interesting Reading

|

Two great articles to read. Firstly, the Irish Times seems to have turned over a new leaf and is giving much better coverage of the No campaign. They report on a canvassing evening on a housing estate where just one person said that they would be voting Yes.


Another article in The Post highlights the danger of multinational companies entering into political debate, and the vote swinging cash that they bring with them.

The more I see of this referendum, the more I think that the Yes campaign has massively over-played its hand and we just might see another No result.

Irish democrats still say no to Lisbon

Friday 25 September 2009 |

There was a nice article published in the Guardian yesterday by Declan Ganley. It's interesting to see such a piece in the usually pro-everything-EU paper.


Being Irish, it's hard to imagine how it must appear to an outsider looking at our second referendum on the Lisbon treaty. At least somebody out there reading this must be jealous – we get to vote twice and you don't get to vote at all. Perhaps the most interesting thing about our re-vote is the way in which it was regarded as a certainty after the original referendum. The votes were literally not counted before some Irish media personalities, and EU leaders, were speculating on a timeline for round two. You see, "no" results are never about the treaty. No. They are about domestic issues, or people are misinformed, or enemies of Europe have lied to the poor unsuspecting people. By contrast, "yes" votes are ringing endorsements of Brussels, based on informed, thoughtful analysis.

As such, we Irish behaved badly, and were therefore required as a matter of course to vote again. Nearly every EU leader agrees with this. Their own people must not vote, but the Irish must vote twice. It would be funny – a parody in fact – were it not real. It is what has become of the European Union, and it is the single most compelling reason to reject the treaty again.

Europe cannot go on like this. Opponents cannot continue to be treated as dissident enemies of the state (for a state is what this treaty creates) who must be undermined and smeared at every opportunity. I use my own experience not to beseech your pity in this regard, but as an example. In the last 18 months, as I tried to highlight these issues both in Ireland and around Europe, I have been attacked by EU leaders and officials variously as a CIA agent, a KGB asset, an MI5 plant, an agent of the neoconservative movement (the evils of whom are assumed in aGodwinesque fashion), a eurosceptic, a religious extremist and a neo-Nazi. I kid you not.

And what have we, the opponents of the treaty, been saying to merit this kind of attitude? Well, we think it's anti-democratic. We think it sends more and more power to Brussels and sends nothing in the way of democratic accountability in the other direction. It creates a president, a job which is being fought over at this very moment in smoke-filled rooms around Europe without regard to the views of the citizenry. This person will be our spokesperson for years to come, and their views will largely determine the agenda, voice, and direction of an EU council that will be more powerful than ever. You and I have no say on who this will be. It creates a foreign minister in the same fashion. An EU diplomatic corps. It expands ever further the reach of the commission, that unelected bureau in whom is vested the sole power to initiate, conservatively, 60% of member state law. It vests in the European parliament the power only to amend or suggest certain approaches, and it continues the trend away from subsidiarity towards centralisation.

Our politicians love it. It's easy to see why. Adam Smith's invisible hand of profit guides their action, though in this case their profits are not directly financial. It is another step in the dramatisation of politics. Our leaders at home will continue to present themselves before us, but have fewer and fewer responsibilities. A single prime minister alone cannot be blamed for every irritating EU directive. Your local MP cannot take responsibility for decisions made in Brussels. Our leaders have a permanent pension home, and a chance to stride the world stage as leader of what would be the world's second or third political power.

The Lisbon treaty makes politics easier for politicians, and makes political change harder to achieve for citizens. It locks in an economic approach as if history itself has ended. It locks in social legislation as if society has ceased to evolve. It treats the challenges of today as permanent, and ultimately, it redefines democracy as something Brussels aspires to, rather than something we all have a right to. Voting twice? If we say yes, voting once on anything may be a very rare privilege indeed.

No Hint Of Irony

Wednesday 23 September 2009 |

Hypocrisy and outright lies from our politicians are no longer shocking - indeed they are parr for the course these days. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't mock it when we see it.


The pro-Lisbon Irish Times has provided an excellent example of the state of the debate in Ireland. Firstly Brian Cowen says this:

Meanwhile, Mr Cowen yesterday argued that the No side’s efforts to create fear in the public mind had to be stopped.

He said the Yes campaign had to send out a positive message

And then swiftly follows it with this:

“If we stand against the consensus that has emerged in the European Union about the Lisbon Treaty going ahead, that is not going to be good for the country,” he told TV3.

“Two out of three jobs in Ireland are with companies with orders in European markets. People see there are consequences if we vote No. What signals do we send, and why do we put ourselves at risk?”

And this:

“It’s not that we will leave the union immediately. It’s not that there will be an overnight Armageddon.

So the positive, anti-fear campaign from the YES camp is that it is going to be bad for the country, 2/3 of Irish jobs will be at risk and Armageddon will strike, albeit not in the first 24 hours.


"Wake Up and Smell the Bull"

Tuesday 22 September 2009 |

Libertas today hit out at the absurd claims by the Irish Government that the Lisbon Treaty will create jobs in Ireland. I don't think that political statements get much blunter than this:

“Just show us where the jobs are in the Lisbon Treaty” is the challenge Libertas Leader Declan Ganley is laying down to the Yes campaign this morning. With just about a week and a half to go to polling day, Mr. Ganley said that the people of Ireland were beginning to “wake up and smell the bull”.

“We’ve had months of this nonsense about jobs, nearly all of it coming from people who would fail junior cert economics, if their record is anything to go by” Mr. Ganley said. “And despite all of this, we are only aware of one job that will be definitely saved by Lisbon, and it belongs to Brian Cowen”.

“We’ve had the referendum commission say they are lying. We’ve had the Wall Street Journal say they are lying. We’ve had the Financial Times say they are lying. We’ve had yes side strategists boasting to the media about how they intend to “persuade” people that this is about the economy. We’ve had months and months of dreary, tired, stupid nonsense about jobs, and they can’t point to a single one”

“We’ve seen millions of taxpayer’s euros spent on posters waffling about jobs. We’ve seen Pat Cox, who wouldn’t have earned a dime for most of his career if he’d been in business, tell people to be afraid. We’ve had the Dick and Mick road show from Iveagh house running around the country telling people to be afraid. We’ve had Enda Kenny desperately trying to postpone an election with a yes vote because he’s terrified of having to write a budget. We’ve had the whole, tired, pathetic, lot.

But not one example of a job.

It’s time to put up, or shut up. Show us the jobs, or prove, once and for all, that the country is led by a bunch of spoofers who’d say and do anything to get people to vote for this rotten, discredited, and defeated piece of junk they call a Treaty”

Anti-Lisbon videos on Youtube

Monday 21 September 2009 |

A couple of videos for your entertainment:



Our President has been selected for us.

Friday 18 September 2009 |

José Manuel Barroso was 'elected' as President of the European Commission for a second term, on Wednesday.


It couldn't come at a better time, as the Irish start warming up for their enforced second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. What better representation of the EU than a President who hasn't been elected by the European public. Anywhere. Yes, he's not even an MEP as far as I can see.

So not only is he unelected as President by us, he can't be unelected by any public anywhere. This is a selection not an election for the most important political position in Europe. Welcome to the post-democratic era, which can only get worse under the Lisbon Treaty.

But the question is: would MEPs have been forced to vote again if they picked the wrong candidate?

Having complained that we don't get to elect our President, what would happen if we did? It would be a disaster of Eurovision proportions, with national and regional interests monopolising the voting patterns. It just highlights the nonsense of an artificial state being created against the wishes of the public.

Daniel Hannan put it well in his recent article for the Telegraph:

It cannot be stressed too often that democracy requires a demos: a unit with which we identify when we use the word “we”. Take away the demos and you’re left only with the kratos: the power of a system that must compel by force of law what it dare not ask in the name of civic patriotiosm.

No, the solution is to return power to the units with which voters feel genuine identification, namely the national parliaments.

"UKIP should just go home"

|

In a press statement issued earlier today, Declan Ganley asked UKIP to leave the Irish political scene. It's obviously a tricky issue; the Irish decision will have implications for everyone in Europe, not just Ireland. Does that give the rest of us a right to interfere? Probably.

However, on a practical note, foreign interference is never welcome in politics, and the Libertas team in Ireland believe that UKIP is doing more harm than good by associating the NO campaign with UKIP's right wing image on top of looking like a bunch of foreigners telling the Irish how to vote.

Here's that statement in full:

The United Kingdom Independence Party should pack up its tent and go home, Libertas Leader Declan Ganley said this evening.

Mr. Ganley said that the intervention of the party was “every bit as unwelcome as the parade of Brussels mandarins that will be wheeled out over the coming weeks to lecture the Irish people”:

“We all know that a “Yes” to Lisbon will give the UK more of a say in our affairs – and we may well get a British President of the EU speaking on behalf of Irish people throughout the world – but this interference is unwarranted, unwelcome, unhelpful, and unnecessary” Mr. Ganley said.

“The Irish people showed the world in the first vote that they are not sheep, and will not be bullied. Mr. Farage’s intentions in arriving to these shores are known only to himself, but we do not need a foreign political party to tell us that our politicians are a bunch of arrogant clowns who won’t take no for an answer. We know it already, thanks very much”.

Ends

Libertas back in the game

Thursday 17 September 2009 |

After a long quiet spell, Libertas is back in full swing in Ireland, where the second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty is looming. Declan Ganley has also rejoined the fight.


Today saw a major attack on the YES campaign, following a cracking article in the Wall Street Journal that ripped apart the fear mongering by the YES campaign.

INTERNATIONAL INVESTORS READ TRUTH ABOUT LISBON WHILE YES SIDE LIE – GANLEY

“3 million global business leaders are reading the truth about the Lisbon Treaty this morning while the people of Ireland pass lamp-posts littered with lies on their way to work” Libertas Leader Declan Ganley has said today.

Mr. Ganley was responding to an editorial in the Wall Street Journal which said that Finance Minister Brian Lenihan was “peddling phantom terrors to scare the Irish people into voting Yes”. The paper also said that “no sane businessman” would see a No to Lisbon as a “vote against Europe”, and that Ireland had “no reason to fear the consequences of a No vote”.

Responding, Mr. Ganley said that it was absolutely clear that the only job saved by the Lisbon Treaty would be Brian Cowen’s:

“It’s a sad day when 3 million global business leaders are told the truth by the world’s most famous business newspaper, while the same number and more of Irish people are having the truth hidden from them”,

“This Treaty has absolutely nothing to do with jobs or the economy. It has everything to do with a fanatical class of deluded people at the top of Irish society who are determined to have their way at any cost.”

“The truth is that despite hanging thousands of bland, misleading posters across the country, and rolling out about a hundred astroturf groups made up of the same small fanatical band of professional Brussels-leeches, the Yes side cannot point to a single job this piece of junk treaty would create”.

“Meanwhile, in the real world, the bible of the international investor is telling its readers the truth. There will be no jobs. Ireland will not be a better place to invest. The Government is telling lies. And No sane businessman agrees with their ideas.”

“So, who will the Irish people believe? The same Government that has brought the country to the edge of an economic cliff, or the 33-time Pulitzer Prize winning newspaper which is read by every serious investor on the planet?”

“Other than Brian Cowen’s, the yes side cannot point to a single job that this treaty will create. And therein lies the answer to the question”

Ends

Where now for Libertas?

Friday 19 June 2009 |

After a disappointing election night for Libertas and Declan Ganley's apparent withdrawal from front line politics, many people are questioning the future of Libertas.


I attended a UK get together on Wednesday for candidates and activists, which was quite revealing. Whereas one might have expected gloominess, on the whole people were extremely positive and asking what the next step is. There weren't a lot of answers, but what is clear is that Libertas is going to continue to grow and without the time constraints of an electin to fight immediately, we can do it properly this time.

Discussions are now underway across Europe as to the best way forward, and I am looking forward to Libertas Mk II.

Onwards and upwards!

Declan Ganley looking hopeful

Sunday 7 June 2009 |

The Times today is showing that Declan Ganley might get elected in the North West region of Ireland, despite many smear attempts in certain sections of the Irish press:

Tallies throughout the sprawling area showed high levels of support for Ganley in several areas, not just his base in Galway. This suggested that he could potentially pull off a shock result and take a seat, possibly at the expense of Pat “The Cope” Gallagher of Fianna Fail.
This would be a fantastic result for Libertas and give us a base to fight the Lisbon Treaty from when the Irish are forced to vote again.

Go Declan!

Libertas still campaigning

Saturday 6 June 2009 |

While the other parties in the UK are now somewhat quieter, waiting for the European Election results tomorrow night, Libertas is still going. One of the unusual aspects of us being a pan-European party is that the elections take place at different times.

Ireland voted yesterday, and it is looking good for Declan Ganley by all accounts.

Latvia, Malta and Slovakia, and the Czech Republic are all voting today, and we have candidates in each of those countries, and there are yet more elections tomorrow across Europe.

It does bring home the sheer scale of Libertas and the feeling that we are part of a much wider movement for change.

Blears resigns to spend more time with her constituents

Wednesday 3 June 2009 |

Today Hazel Blears has gone, following Jacqui Smith, announcing 'I am glad to be going home to the people who matter the most to me: the people of Salford.' Aside from the sickening insincerity of it, what this really indicates that she is going to spend the next few months doing nothing but campaigning in her constituency to try to hold on to her seat when Labour collapses at the next General Election.


But what does this mean for the EU elections? Normally a senior minister resigning just before an election would be seen as catastrophic news, but this time, with two of them going (and maybe more), it is just lumped in with the rest of the bad news for Gordon Brown. 

Caroline Flint, the Europe Minister, is widely reported to be the next likely minister to quit.

So just how bad is it all going to get for Gordon tomorrow? The polls are putting Labour on 16-22%,  and I think that they are going to end up under 20%; Labour voters simply aren't going to turn out in numbers as the bad news keeps on landing. This leaves a massive swing vote available in areas of the country that should bring about good results for smaller parties like Libertas, the Greens and UKIP.

The writing's on the wall

|

Libertas managed to grab the attention of Londoners last night with a series of huge messages projected on to the side of London buildings. They look really impressive.










Growing Support for Libertas

Tuesday 2 June 2009 |

With just two days to go before the EU elections, support for Libertas, the pan-European reform party is growing rapidly in the media. As the shine comes off UKIP as the alternative vote, journalists across the board are taking a fresh look at Libertas, the party that took on Brussels and won.

In just the last day or so, the Daily Mail included a glowing piece by Peter Oborne and then the Sun joined in with an endorsement by Trevor Kavanagh and a further compliment in the editorial.

Here are some of the highlights:

A better bet is Libertas, the new party that sensationally humiliated established political parties in Ireland last year. In a brilliant campaign, backed by The Sun, Libertas turned a near-certain YES into a bombshell NO on the Constitution.
- Trevor Kavanagh, The Sun

Many voters are tempted by the increasingly credible Libertas.”
-The Sun Says column

At a time of moral squalor and decay in Westminster and Brussels, both Libertas and Jury Team offer voters a hugely refreshing - and, perhaps, the only proper - alternative on Thursday.
- Peter Oborne, Daily Mail

Libertas challenges MEPs to bare all on expenses.

Thursday 28 May 2009 |

Libertas today organised a publicity stunt to highlight the lack of transparency over expenses from our MEPs. While MPs are under the spotlight, our MEPs are getting away with expense abuse on a massive scale.

Libertas today challenged them to bare all by publishing their expenses in detail, including receipts, for the last five years BEFORE the 4th June so that the voters can see where their money has been going.

 

Moral authority in politics?

Monday 25 May 2009 |

Shocking news from Scotland. According to Alex Salmond, First Minister,

political institutions have lost their "moral authority" in the row over MPs' expenses
I beg to differ. Politicians lost their moral authority long ago. Before any of these expense scandals came out, trust in our politicians was at an all time low, and they were regarded as a money-grabbing sell-outs. People thought that they were crooks before. After the expense scandal, people know that they are crooks.

All of these politicians calling for the 'trust' to be rebuilt are living a fantasy. There was no widespread trust before, and there is almost none now. Publishing expenses doesn't rebuild the trust, it just means that we, the public, get to watch how they are spending our money because we definitely don't trust them to do it in private.

Do our political elites really think that paying money back and publishing expenses is seen as anything more than damage limitation? The fact is that they would NEVER have paid the money back OR published their expenses in detail if it hadn't been for the Telegraph.

If our politicians really want to build trust, they will need to be consistently trust-worthy over a very long period of time. Deselecting every single MP who has had to pay money back is only the first step. That includes David Cameron.

And next they need to surprise us. Reacting to public anger is not going to build the trust. We need innovative leadership.

The Stamp Out Sleaze campaign from Libertas is a good start, but it needs to be applied in practice. Unless we have MEPs and MPs following the principles and leading by example, we will be stuck with the same old politicians stuck in the same rut.

Stamp Out Sleaze Days 4 & 5

Monday 18 May 2009 |


I am coming to this a bit later than I should, but Libertas has now released the final two pledges on its Stamp Out Sleaze pledge cards:

4. I will publish the details of all meetings with lobbyists.
5. I will never abuse my expenses to reward my family.


I can certainly see the importance of full disclosure with regard to lobbyists. It's not a pledge that will excite the masses, but hopefully those more interested in the working of Government will understand the importance.

As for hiring family members, there was a great news item out from Libertas today that summed this up: Tory MEPs are three times more likely to employ their wives

What has amused me immensely though is how much the Tories totally copied our pledges idea today for their launch, even down to using five of them. It's really quite outrageous:
“One – Conservative MEPs will publish online a breakdown of all office costs, signed off by a certified accountant. 
 
“Two – they will publish online details of all travel: to Brussels, to Strasbourg, to any other country. 
 
“Three – they will publish the names of each member of staff they employ.
 
“Four – they will publish details of all meetings with lobbyists and interest groups. 
 
“And five – all of the above will be subject to examination by a scrutiny panel.
 
They already do number 3, so it's no big deal. Number five isn't a pledge; they should be doing that already. 1 & 3, however, are largely the same as our first pledge - to release all expenses in detail. Their number 4 was the same as our number 4. At least Cameron has realised the significance of this.

It's all very encouraging really. You know you are important because the other parties start copying you wholesale. 

Noticeably absent was a Tory promise not to hire family members, and it looks like they are happy for their MEPs and MPs to carry on accepting bribes too.

Stamp Out Sleaze Day 3

Friday 15 May 2009 |

We are into Day 3 of Stamp Out Sleaze week. The pledge launched today was: "I will not accept 'gifts' of any kind". 


This addresses one of the most serious problems in politics today - our politicians are for sale. Few people can forget Peter 'freebie' Mandelson's Caribbean cruises and other 'gifts' that he has accepted. But this is just the most visible abuse of power. Politicians of all levels are being targeted with bungs/bribes/gifts/whatever you want to call them. 

Yet, despite all of the publicity, it still goes on. Our politicians claim that as long as they declare them, they are in some way no longer obligated to the businessses and billionaires buying their attention. Does anyone really believe this?

Given the shocking moral vacuum in Westminster exposed by the expense scandal over the past week, there is nothing that we shouldn't question. We simply cannot trust our politicians any more. We certainly can't believe them when they tell us that the 'gifts' don't compromise them in any way.

We pay our politicians well enough that they don't need to accept freebies - it is pure GREED that drives them to do so.

Libertas is the ONLY party that has pledged to refuse freebies. Let's hope some of the other parties copy our policies soon.

Today's bulletin from Libertas head office included this amazing snippet, about the continuing surge of interest in Libertas:

Libertas.eu, the website of the pan European people’s movement for more democracy, accountability and transparency in the EU, had more visitors mid-week than any other political party in the world. Figures from Alexa, the web tracking company, for Wednesday May 13th , show Libertas blazing ahead, leaving even the US Democratic party website trailing.
You can see the Alexa ranking information here: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/libertas.eu

Stamp Out Sleaze Day 2

Thursday 14 May 2009 |

The second pledge has been released today: "I will attend at least 90% of Parliamentary days."

It is accompanied by a report that the average attendance of MEPs in the European Parliament is just 77%, dragged down somewhat by UKIP's pitiful voting attendance of just 60%!

So why is the voting important? Because that's why we have so much bureaucracy coming from Brussels; it gets voted though in the Parliament. If our MEPs aren't there voting for or against it, we are unrepresented. Every time an MEP fails to vote, 800,000 British people lose their vote in the Parliament.

The fact that UKIP MEPs are the worst offenders by a wide margin is astonishing. For a party that claims to be the primary opposition to Brussels, they seem to be spending rather more time in the bar than actually voting and arguing against the mass of unnecessary laws spewing out of the EU Parliament.

In contrast, today's pledges makes it clear that Libertas MEPs will be there every day, working hard to change the EU and fighting against unwanted bureaucracy and waste.

I just wish the pledge had been for 100% attendance, but I suppose that it impossible due to other commitments.

Party Election Broadcast

Wednesday 13 May 2009 |

Party Election Broadcast

There will be a Libertas Party Election Broadcast for the European Elections on BBC1 & BBC2 (England) on Tuesday 26th May

- BBC1 22:35
- BBC2 23:20



Sign the petition!


Over 550 candidates!

|

It was announced today that Libertas is fielding over 550 candidates across Europe for the June elections. This is a monumental achievement, especially given that the party didn't even exist six months ago.


As far as I know, no other party has ever managed to stand in more than one country, let alone right across Europe.

Stamp Out Sleaze Day 1

Tuesday 12 May 2009 |

In what has to be one of the most exciting political moves in a very long time, Libertas today began a Stamp Out Sleaze campaign designed to establish a whole new set of standards for political behaviour.

There will be five pledges in total, with the first one launched today; a promise to print all expense claims in detail, including receipts and discussion of why the payment was necessary.

Libertas MEPs will be the first to offer us real and detailed information about how they are spending our money, and to offer justification for why each payment was needed. If only we could have this level of analysis in every level of Government!

One only has to compare this to the disgusting display of greed and abuse of the expense system by the Tories and Labour, as exposed by the Daily Telegraph, to see just how far ahead of the game Libertas really are.

No other party has even come close to providing this level of information. The Tories claimed to be offering 'full disclosure' last year, but a quick look at what Cameron thinks of as 'full' shows that it was a lie. Here's one of the Tory expense documents. What does it tell us about our Tory MEPs? That they make phone calls, travel, hire their wives and... well that's it. It's hard to imagine how they could have made this information any less useful. 

UKIP, the supposed champions against the EU haven't even bothered to pretend to publish their expenses. Perhaps Nigel Farage doesn't want people knowing that he hires his wife too.

All in all, the election just changed to becoming a choice between the same old has-beens and the flag-bearers of honesty in politics; Libertas.

I can't wait for the next pledge release. 

Klaus won't give up yet.

|

It would appear that Vaclav Klaus isn't giving in as easily as Graham Watson and the other anti-democrats would like. Here is a press statement from him from last week (sorry for the poor translation in places):

Press statement by the President of the Czech Republic after the Senate vote on the Lisbon Treaty

I must express my disappointment that after an unprecedented political and media - foreign and domestic - pressure some senators resigned to the views they had publically held until recently, and with them also to their political and civic integrity, and they agreed with the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. They thus turned their back to the long-term interests of the Czech Republic and what they put above them was the short-term interests of the current political representations and their own.
It is a very sad evidence of another failure of an important part of our political elites which we know so well from various similar moments of our history. Our politicians have always found some cowardly reasons of this sort: We are small, weak, we do not mean anything in the European context, we must conform, despite we do not agree with it. This is something I refuse. We either regained our sovereignty after November 1989, and together with it the responsibility for the fate of our country, or it was all a tragic mistake. This is a very up-to-date reminder in the year of the twentieth anniversary of November 1989.
Now, I will wait if a group of senators, as some of them announced, asks the Constitutional Court for another scrutiny of the Lisbon Treaty in relation to our Constitution. If this takes place, I will not be considering my decision to ratify the Lisbon Treaty or not before the Constitutional Court issues its decision.
My views on this matter are known and clear. I can’t afford to be resolutely against at one moment, and then, because it begins to fit my personal political and career objectives, easily change my opinion.
Let me emphasize that for this moment, the Lisbon Treaty is dead, because it was rejected in a referendum in one of the member states. That is why my deciding about the ratification of this Treaty is not the issue of the day.

According to the Prague Monitor today, "The leader of the European Liberals in the European Parliament, Graham Watson, said, "Václav Klaus should now sign the document in blood - ahead of the EU summit in June. What we need now is certainty, not more obfuscation." 

It would seem that Graham Watson, Lib Dem MEP for the South West, still hasn't grasped the concept of democracy and is, like so many other european elites, applying undue pressure on Vaclav Klaus, the President of the Czech Republic to sign the Lisbon Treaty. Klaus has already publicly stated that he won't sign it until every other country has ratified it. 

Ireland is due to hold another referendum in October. In theory, the Lisbon Constitution should be dead and buried - killed off by the only country that allowed its citizens a vote. However, Graham Watson and the rest of the anti-democrats have run out of ideas and insist on pursuing their immensely unpopular federalist agenda.

Let's hope Watson and the others lose their seats in June.


The Tories will save us. Or not.

Wednesday 29 April 2009 |

There must be an election coming soon or something because William Hague has been wheeled out for yet another lengthy puff piece. Once again he is making vague promises that a future Tory government would do blah blah blah:

He promised immediate legislation for a referendum to reject the treaty if it had not been ratified by the whole of the EU by the time that the Conservatives took power.

He left open the door to the possibility of the Tories promising a referendum in their election manifesto even if the treaty had been ratified by then.

Well, that's me convinced. We might as well pack up and go home; William Hague will nip into government, fix the EU and be back in time for tea and medals.

There are one or two niggling doubts about the Tory promises that are barely worth mentioning however. Firstly, as Hague admits, there is only a 50-50 chance that the Constitution/Lisbon Treaty won't have been ratified by the time the Tories get into government; at which point they can't legally do anything. The chances of the treaty being ratified will be significantly less if Libertas can produce a good result in the June elections, and we can send a strong message from right across Europe that the Constitution is not what the people want.

Secondly, one doesn't hold a referendum to 'reject' a treaty. This fundamental misunderstanding of a basic principle of democracy is deeply worrying. A referendum is held to find out what the public want. If the Tories thought that they could lose such a referendum, would they still be (vaguely) promising it? 

More importantly, the Lisbon Treaty is just the tip of the iceberg. The EU is in a disastrous anti-democratic mess and there's zero evidence that the Conservatives have even considered a plan for fixing it. They seem happy with the EU as it is and never mutter a word about reform. 

The final point about all of this is that the Tories are transparently trying to link a referendum in Britain with voting for the Conservatives in the EU elections... although the two issues are completely separate. No amount of Tory MEPs are going to make any difference to whether we get a referendum in Britain. They haven't made a difference for the last ten years, and they won't make any difference for the next five either.

If you want something to change, then you need to change your vote.



Libertas.eu is the most visited political website in Europe

Monday 27 April 2009 |

This was an interesting snippet that came out of one of the daily briefings:

As the Libertas movement gears up for the European elections in June, the Libertas.eu website is more visited than any other party's website in Europe.

Libertas chairman Declan Ganley said "With just over a month to go, this is great news for us. This is a tremendous start and shows how quickly a grassroots movement in one country can turn into a serious political force across the whole of the EU27"

A full break-down of Libertas.eu can be found here:  
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/libertas.eu
Obviously we are at something of an advantage by virtue of being the only party standing right across the European Union, but this is still encouraging news, especially given that the EU campaigning frenzy hasn't started yet.

Libertas declares war

Wednesday 22 April 2009 |

Libertas today declared war on corruption in the European Parliament with a threat to name and shame all MEPs who vote to approve the latest accounts in tomorrow's vote.


The latest auditors' report continues the now annual tradition of telling us what a poor state the EU's accounting systems are in, and that billions of euros (and pounds) of our money is being wasted.

MEPs don't appear to regard this as their responsibility. That has to change, and if they won't do it willingly, then we will have to embarrass them into doing it, until we have Libertas MEPs who will actually tackle it head on.

This is the front line in the battle against EU corruption and waste. I look forward to the release of the names in the next day or two.

Robin Matthews interviewed by Spiked

Tuesday 21 April 2009 |

Robin Matthews was interviewed by Spiked:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6558/

Not a bad bit of coverage at all!

EU bans 'dangerous' anoraks

|

When I read the headline, I thought that my time was up, but apparently this is a genuine EU decision to tackle the severe risk to children from drawstrings in their anorak hoods. 


It's hard to know what to say. This is the front line of the battle against the bureaucrats, where common sense has no place, and risk is no longer seen as character developing, but something to be avoided at all costs.

Let's hope that the Libertas ideology of promotion of small businesses and risk taking to rebuild the damaged economies of Europe will directly challenge the gutless nanny-state being built in Brussels.

Lobbyists stick two fingers up to transparency

Monday 20 April 2009 |

Registration for lobbyists in Brussels is going to remain voluntary despite just a 9% sign up rate, according to a Libertas statement released today.


Although it may not sound like a big deal, the secret meetings with lobbyists are one of the biggest problems in Brussels. Not only are the most important people in the EU unelected, they are also heavily influenced by the 15,000 lobbyists based in Brussels. The attempt to encourage them to sign a voluntary register has failed, but in true EU style, they are ignoring the problem.

Unsurprisingly 91% of these lobbyists have decided that they would rather not announce themselves and instead will carry on meeting with Commissioners, bureaucrats and MEPs in secret. We don't even know who these lobbyists represent.

We already know from experience in the UK that lobbyists buy access to ministers and MPs though conferences, free tickets, flights etc, but lobbying in Brussels is on a whole different scale, with nearly 20 lobbyists for every MEP.

I am hoping that Libertas will not only continue to fight for a mandatory register, but will lead by example and publish the details of all meetings between Libertas MEPs and lobbyists in Brussels.

Tory MEPs vote themselves a major pay rise

Saturday 18 April 2009 |

Continuing the theme of salaries, expenses and pensions in the EU, Libertas today revealed the following new details. MEPs - including Labour and the Conservatives - have voted themselves a lucrative pay deal that kicks in AFTER the European election in June.  


Here are the details:
  • A base salary of €7,665 per month (that's £82,000 per year, taxed at a special rate of only 15%)
  • Daily allowance of €298, just for turning up (which works out at £1,300 per week)
  • Secretarial expenses of €4,202 per month extra (£45,000 annually), although no proof is needed to claim the cash, on top of the £125,000 they already get.
  • All business-class travel expenses on top of this.
  • A gold-plated pension scheme, guaranteed by YOU, the taxpayer, to the tune of over €200 million.
Now I don't have a problem with our representatives being well paid. I do have a problem with them awarding themselves substantial pay bonuses a) during a recession and b) when they are doing a poor job of sorting the EU out. 

I also don't see why MEPs need to travel in business class. This must add a vast amount to the travel expenses and only serves to fluff their egos; hardly something we need. Isn't it time that our MEPs were reminded that they are supposed to be servants of the people?

For the political geeks out there, here are how our esteemed Tory MEPs voted on the new pay scheme:
Voted For:

Richard Ashworth MEP

Rt Hon Sir Robert Atkins MEP

Christopher Beazley MEP

John Bowis OBE MEP

Philip Bradbourn OBE DMA MEP

Philip Bushill-Matthews MEP

Martin Callanan MEP

James Elles MEP

Malcolm Harbour MEP

Chris Heaton-Harris MEP

Roger Helmer MEP

Dr Caroline Jackson MEP

Mr Sajjad Karim MEP

Timothy Kirkhope MEP

Edward McMillan-Scott MEP

Neil Parish MEP

David Sumberg MEP

Against:

Giles Chichester MEP

John Purvis CBE MEP

Robert Sturdy MEP

Abstension
Nirj Deva DL FRSA MEP

Struan Stevenson MEP

Dr Charles Tannock MEP

Not Participating
Daniel Hannan MEP

Jonathan Evans MEP

Syed Kamall MEP

Geoffrey Van Orden MBE MEP